This is an excerpt from his article on the Huffington Post today:
Will Cheney pay him off, preemptively? Will they go to court? I would imagine if a guy with a few beers in him shoots you in the face on a hunting trip, how could you turn down that opportunity?What gives this colossal waste of space the authority to comment so speculatively? Was he there? Or is he just taking talking points from the Daily Kos? There's a reason Baldwin is the "Head FAG" in Team America: World Police.
Only on the left can you blatantly lie and get praise for it. If Clint Eastwood were to write an op-ed in the Wall Street Journal that said something along the lines of, "Why did Clinton pardon all of those people in the waning hours of his presidency? Was he payed off, preemptively? I would imagine if a guy had sex with an intern in the Oval Office he would be held accountable," he would be excoriated by every liberal media outlet -- obscure and mainstream. These are two occasions where a sitting President indubitably engaged in highly questionable behavior yet is still held in high esteem.
VP Cheney was involved in a simple hunting accident. There is NOTHING MORE TO IT! There's no cloak-and-dagger conspiracy that is being covered up. No matter how much these punks at the Daily Kos and the brainless celebrities in Hollywood speculate, it won't change the factual events of that day. So Cheney had a beer at lunch. Does that mean he broke the rules by hunting three hours later? It does if you're a vicious lefty who wants nothing more than to see this administration engrossed in a scandal like their hero Bill Clinton was.